Monday, March 25, 2013

paper three rough draft


Lying to win the race

Introduction

All the pressure of the whole world watching you anticipating another title and waiting on your victory speech, you know you’ve fooled them for over a decade already so why stop now. I mean who’s actually going to win a Tour De France title without banned drugs anyway right? Wrong. Typically we look at athletes as clean competitors but however dated back to the 1968 doping cases have taken over the professional world of sports. (Dilger)  Some of the largest names in sports have been tried and caught for cheating with banned drugs including Lance Armstrong. He used banned drugs for many years and got away with it for the majority of time. Just because athletes have gotten away with it before does not make it right. No matter how you look at it, it’s a form of cheating.

            These athletes are looked up to by people around the world as heroes and competitors when in reality some of them turn out to just be liars. The pressure for athletes to succeed should be a reason to push yourself harder not to take the easy way and use drugs that will help you to win. Doping in sports is an urgent issue because it affects not only athletes themselves but agencies and fans that stand behind these sports. Drug agencies are working on a way to prevent it but there are still debates about sufficient ways to end doping in sports all together. Lance was stripped of all 7 of his Tour De France titles but should it have to get to that point? We need to put an end to doping before the truthful athletes get second place.

History of doping

            In 2004 there were 26 reported cases of doping in the summer Olympics alone. (Rosenberg) Doping in sports has been around for many years and is only getting worse. As sports began to grow larger so did the need to succeed. As time went on athletes realized using certain performance enhancing drugs would increase their chances of winning. The more winning meant the more sponsors, endorsements, and of course, fans. As I hear these excuses or lack thereof it doesn’t make sense to me. Being an athlete myself I know that the pressure always fueled me. Just the fact that these athletes went years lying is astonishing, winning would not be the same knowing you cheated.

The earliest records of doping in sport come from the Ancient Olympics games when athletes are reported to have taken figs to improve their performance. (Williams) As agencies grew more aware of the issue they decided to start testing athletes and put a ban of drugs. In the early 19th century athletes started experimenting with drugs to enhance strength and overcome fatigue. (Holt) Since it was not yet illegal there was no telling the extent of what these athletes would do to win. Now that there are rules set in place it makes it harder on athletes, but not impossible yet, for them to cheat.

Athlete’s stand point

            In 1949 Fausto Coppi, an Italian cyclist, admitted to using amphetamines to win races. He also said he had to use them to remain competitive in the sport. (Holt) Most professional athletes that are caught doping today claim to only use drugs cause without them no one would be able to do such things like the Tour De France race. Athletes don’t plan on getting caught and see it as an aid to win the title. No matter how pressured you are that’s not an excuse. Using banned drugs should not be an option. One of the most recent doping cases of doping in sports is Lance Armstrong. After he admitted he was stripped of his 7 Tour De France titles and had to pay back all of his endorsement money. He would’ve never guessed he would be banned from the sport for life. Since there is no real consequences and most athletes get there bans shortened anyway more athletes are cheating. Without using banned drugs, Armstrong would not have won the Tour de France and without those titles, he would not be famous. Without all his career titles, he would not be have made millions in endorsements. Lance Armstrong would have been nobody without the help of doping. (Rosenberg)

Agencies stand point

            For every sport there are agencies that stand behind the athletes. Along with these agencies there are also anti-doping agencies which work to put an end to doping and deal with athletes that have been caught. Macur of the New York Times said that after Lance was caught the United States Anti-Doping Agency set an appointment to meet with him and give him the chance to come completely clean but lance refused. By lance meeting with the agency he would be “part of the solution.” (Macur) By lancing attending the meeting he could give the agency names of any coaches, officials, or team mates that helped cover up or hide his doping which would help them to clear the industry of cheating.

            Catching the athletes that are using banned drugs is very important to these agencies. Whether it’s considered a high ranking sport or not the cheating isn’t okay and needs to be put to an end. The Canadian government has renewed its 957,729 contribution to the World Anti-Doping Agency for 2012. (Kondro) The more athletes that are willing to give information the easier it will be to come up with a better solution for this problem. These agencies are committed to finding a solution for this issue and holding those athletes responsible for their actions.

No comments:

Post a Comment